🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that indecision on how best to address the issue is creating avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while working overseas. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to think this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families are calling for additional sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others contend the moment for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the right solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.